Sample Analysis of “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears”
Rich Paul Cooper
How to Read This Section
In this section, we will provide you with a sample student essay. To prepare yourself for this essay, read the short story “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears”.[1] If you can’t use the hyperlink, we’ve included the story below. Don’t worry, it’s short! The Queen of the Woods had no interest in love, turning away all manner of troubadours and knights and never demanding quests or errantry. Until, one day, she challenges her suitors to make her cry a single tear. The student essay itself is meant to be an imperfect example. As such, we’ve included textual notes to aid you, to point out where the essay could improve and where the essay excels.
“The Quest of the Queen’s Tears”[2][3]
Sylvia, Queen of the Woods, in her woodland palace, held court, and made a mockery of her suitors. She would sing to them, she said, she would give them banquets, she would tell them tales of legendary days, her jugglers should caper before them, her armies salute them, her fools crack jests with them and make whimsical quips, only she could not love them.
This was not the way, they said, to treat princes in their splendor and mysterious troubadours concealing kingly names; it was not in accordance with fable; myth had no precedent for it. She should have thrown her glove, they said, into some lion’s den, she should have asked for a score of venomous heads of the serpents of Licantara, or demanded the death of any notable dragon, or sent them all upon some deadly quest, but that she could not love them — ! It was unheard of — it had no parallel in the annals of romance.
And then she said that if they must needs have a quest she would offer her hand to him who first should move her to tears: and the quest should be called, for reference in histories or song, the Quest of the Queen’s Tears, and he that achieved them she would wed, be he only a petty duke of lands unknown to romance.
And many were moved to anger, for they hoped for some bloody quest; but the old lords chamberlain said, as they muttered among themselves in a far, dark end of the chamber, that the quest was hard and wise, for that if she could ever weep she might also love. They had known her all her childhood; she had never sighed. Many men had she seen, suitors and courtiers, and had never turned her head after one went by. Her beauty was as still sunsets of bitter evenings when all the world is frore, a wonder and a chill. She was as a sun-stricken mountain uplifted alone, all beautiful with ice, a desolate and lonely radiance late at evening far up beyond the comfortable world, not quite to be companioned by the stars, the doom of the mountaineer.
If she could weep, they said, she could love, they said.
And she smiled pleasantly on those ardent princes, and troubadours concealing kingly names.
Then one by one they told, each suitor prince the story of his love, with outstretched hands and kneeling on the knee; and very sorry and pitiful were the tales, so that often up in the galleries some maid of the palace wept. And very graciously she nodded her head like a listless magnolia in the deeps of the night moving idly to all the breezes its glorious bloom.
And when the princes had told their desperate loves and had departed away with no other spoil than of their own tears only, even then there came the unknown troubadours and told their tales in song, concealing their gracious names.
And there was one, Ackronnion, clothed with rags, on which was the dust of roads, and underneath the rags was war-scarred armour whereon were dints of blows; and when he stroked his harp and sang his song, in the gallery above maidens wept, and even old lords chamberlain whimpered among themselves and thereafter laughed through their tears and said: “It is easy to make old people weep and to bring idle tears from lazy girls; but he will not set a-weeping the Queen of the Woods.”
And graciously she nodded, and he was the last. And disconsolate went away those dukes and princes, and troubadours in disguise. Yet Ackronnion pondered as he went away.
King he was of Afarmah, Lool and Haf, over-lord of Zeroora and hilly Chang, and duke of the dukedoms of Molong and Mlash, none of them unfamiliar with romance or unknown or overlooked in the making of myth. He pondered as he went in his thin disguise.
Now by those that do not remember their childhood, having other things to do, be it understood that underneath fairyland, which is, as all men know, at the edge of the world, there dwelleth the Gladsome Beast. A synonym he for joy.
It is known how the lark in its zenith, children at play out-of-doors, good witches and jolly old parents have all been compared — how aptly! — with this very same Gladsome Beast. Only one “crab” he has (if I may use slang for a moment to make myself perfectly clear), only one drawback, and that is that in the gladness of his heart he spoils the cabbages of the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland, — and of course he eats men.
It must further be understood that whoever may obtain the tears of the Gladsome Beast in a bowl, and become drunken upon them, may move all persons to shed tears of joy so long as he remains inspired by the potion to sing or to make music.
Now Ackronnion pondered in this wise: that if he could obtain the tears of the Gladsome Beast by means of his art, withholding him from violence by the spell of music, and if a friend should slay the Gladsome Beast before his weeping ceased — for an end must come to weeping even with men — that so he might get safe away with the tears, and drink them before the Queen of the Woods and move her to tears of joy. He sought out therefore a humble knightly man who cared not for the beauty of Sylvia, Queen of the Woods, but had found a woodland maiden of his own once long ago in summer. And the man’s name was Arrath, a subject of Ackronnion, a knight-at-arms of the spear-guard: and together they set out through the fields of fable until they came to Fairyland, a kingdom sunning itself (as all men know) for leagues along the edges of the world. And by a strange old pathway they came to the land they sought, through a wind blowing up the pathway sheer from space with a kind of metallic taste from the roving stars. Even so they came to the windy house of thatch where dwells the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland sitting by parlour windows that look away from the world. He made them welcome in his star-ward parlour, telling them tales of Space, and when they named to him their perilous quest he said it would be a charity to kill the Gladsome Beast; for he was clearly one of these that liked not its happy ways. And then he took them out through his back door, for the front door had no pathway nor even a step — from it the old man used to empty his slops sheer on to the Southern Cross — and so they came to the garden wherein his cabbages were, and those flowers that only blow in Fairyland, turning their faces always towards the comet, and he pointed them out the way to the place he called Underneath, where the Gladsome Beast had his lair. Then they manoeuvered. Ackronnion was to go by the way of the steps with his harp and an agate bowl, while Arrath went round by a crag on the other side. Then the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland went back to his windy house, muttering angrily as he passed his cabbages, for he did not love the ways of the Gladsome Beast; and the two friends parted on their separate ways.
Nothing perceived them but that ominous crow glutted overlong already upon the flesh of man.
The wind blew bleak from the stars.
At first there was dangerous climbing, and then Ackronnion gained the smooth, broad steps that led from the edge to the lair, and at that moment heard at the top of the steps the continuous chuckles of the Gladsome Beast.
He feared then that its mirth might be insuperable, not to be saddened by the most grievous song; nevertheless he did not turn back then, but softly climbed the stairs and, placing the agate bowl upon a step, struck up the chaunt called Dolorous. It told of desolate, regretted things befallen happy cities long since in the prime of the world. It told of how the gods and beasts and men had long ago loved beautiful companions, and long ago in vain. It told of the golden host of happy hopes, but not of their achieving. It told how Love scorned Death, but told of Death’s laughter. The contented chuckles of the Gladsome Beast suddenly ceased in his lair. He rose and shook himself. He was still unhappy. Ackronnion still sang on the chaunt called Dolorous. The Gladsome Beast came mournfully up to him. Ackronnion ceased not for the sake of his panic, but still sang on. He sang of the malignity of time. Two tears welled large in the eyes of the Gladsome Beast. Ackronnion moved the agate bowl to a suitable spot with his foot. He sang of autumn and of passing away. The the beast wept as the frore hills weep in the thaw, and the tears splashed big into the agate bowl. Ackronnion desperately chaunted on; he told of the glad unnoticed things men see and do not see again, of sunlight beheld unheeded on faces now withered away. The bowl was full. Ackronnion was desperate: the Beast was so close. Once he thought that its mouth was watering! — but it was only the tears that had run on the lips of the Beast. He felt as a morsel! The Beast was ceasing to weep! He sang of worlds that had disappointed the gods. And all of a sudden, crash! and the staunch spear of Arrath went home behind the shoulder, and the tears and the joyful ways of the Gladsome Beast were ended and over for ever.
And carefully they carried the bowl of tears away leaving the body of the Gladsome Beast as a change of diet for the ominous crow; and going by the windy house of thatch they said farewell to the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland, who when he heard of the deed rubbed his hands together and mumbled again and again, “And a very good thing, too. My cabbages! My cabbages!”
And not long after Ackronnion sang again in the sylvan palace of the Queen of the Woods, having first drunk all the tears in his agate bowl. And it was a gala night, and all the court were there and ambassadors from the lands of legend and myth, and even some from Terra Cognita.
And Ackronnion sang as he never sang before, and will not sing again. O, but dolorous, dolorous, are all the ways of man, few and fierce are his days, and the end trouble, and vain, vain his endeavor: and woman — who shall tell of it? — her doom is written with man’s by listless, careless gods with their faces to other spheres.
Somewhat thus he began, and then inspiration seized him, and all the trouble in the beauty of his song may not be set down by me: there was much of gladness in it, and all mingled with grief: it was like the way of man: it was like our destiny.
Sobs arose at his song, sighs came back along echoes: seneschals, soldiers, sobbed, and a clear cry made the maidens; like rain the tears came down from gallery to gallery.
All round the Queen of the Woods was a storm of sobbing and sorrow.
But no, she would not weep.
Sample Prompt and Student Essay
Assignment Description: In this chapter, we’ve discussed the Tolkien and anti-Tolkien traditions of fantasy literature. In the section above, we examined in detail an important precursor to the anti-Tolkien tradition. For this essay, you will analyze an important precursor to the Tolkien tradition: Lord Dunsany’s “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears”. Concepts such as joy, recovery, consolation, enchantment, eucatastrophe, secondary belief, and mythmaking are defined and explained by Tolkien in his foundational essay “On Fairy-Stories,” and at various points throughout this chapter. Research that essay and the surrounding academic literature to make an informed argument about some aspect of “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears.”
Content: Be sure to support all of your points about the story with specific quotations.
Research Expectations: Use at least one secondary source to introduce or support your thesis and be sure to include a Works Cited page.
Format: Follow MLA guidelines for formatting and citations.
Scope/Word Count: 900–1200 words not including the Works Cited page or heading information.
Sample Student Essay | Instructor Comments |
---|---|
Kristen York Reign of Anti-Tolkien Tradition in Dunsany’s “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears” |
|
Lord Dunsany’s “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears” is a short story that opens by telling about Sylvia, Queen of the Woods, who cannot fall in love despite having numerous suitors. Her suitors ask for a quest to win her hand, to which she says that she will marry the first man who can “move her to tears” (Dunsany). One of her suitors, Ackronnion, accepts this quest by drinking the tears of the Gladsome Beast, which gives Ackronnion the power to move anyone to tears of joy through song. However, even after killing the Beast, drinking its tears, and singing to Sylvia, Ackronnion is still unable to make Sylvia cry; and the tale ends with Sylvia’s inability to weep. Because of the story’s unresolved ending, the story veers from the Tolkien tradition of fantasy, a tradition that states that fantasy stories recover old ways of “seeing things” and offer consolation for reality’s sorrows.[1] In Lord Dunsany’s “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears,” Dunsany follows Tolkien tradition by adopting the plot structure of a European romance but strays from this tradition by estranging Western conventions in tales and not offering a eucatastrophe.[2] |
1. Following this thesis, how does Dunsany work in ways reminiscent of Tolkien? How does he work in ways not reminiscent of Tolkien?
2. How can eucatastrophe be better defined before it is mentioned in the thesis? |
Lord Dunsany first relies upon the structure of a European romance for his tale, and therefore his story is in line with Tolkien tradition in this regard; however, he does so to critique the heroic qualities of romances, which offers a platform for him to create estrangement.[1] In a European romance, the plot generally requires a knight or hero to go on an adventure so that he can rescue a lady, obtain a lady’s love, or pursue other chivalric reasons (where he usually still engages with the love of a lady in the process).[2] “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears” opens in a courtly setting, with Sylvia’s suitors begging her to send them on “some deadly quest” for her hand in marriage. However, she “mocks” them by entertaining them at court (Dunsany). The suitors say, “This was not the way, they said, to treat princes in their splendor and mysterious troubadours concealing kingly names; it was not in accordance with fable; myth had no precedent for it” (Dunsany). These knights and courtly men claim that Sylvia is keeping them from fulfilling their heroic duties in a romance – specifically that she is not allowing them to follow traditions seen in “fable” and “myth.” Dunsany uses Sylvia to oppose the structure of a European romance since she is a woman with unattainable love and she does not require a dangerous quest (her suitors even being angered by the fact that the quest she offers is not dangerous). Dunsany, therefore, notifies his readers early on that his tale will stray from the conventions of the romance, which allows him to critique the genre by undermining Western heroic deeds. Dunsany’s fantasy does not offer Tolkien’s “recovery,” or a way to revive his readers’ initial perceptions of romance stories, but strives to show a new order that breaks away from Western structure.[3] |
1. Not the bipartite thesis structure expressed in the topic sentences.
2. How can this point be reinforced/given more credibility? 3. Different research paths create different analytical contexts. Here, the analysis centers the implicit critique of folk and fairy tales in the Western romance tradition. If someone approached this text from a feminist point of view, what different interpretations might they generate about a scene such as this one? |
However, Ackronnion tries to maintain the order of a romance by taking on a violent quest even though the quest Sylvia presents does not require violence.[1] Ackronnion is described as an experienced knight who is “clothed with rags, on which was the dust of roads, and underneath the rags was war-scarred armour whereon were dints of blows” (Dunsany). Ackronnion is well travelled, as seen by his rags which carry “dust of roads,” (Dunsany), and he has already fought wars, his armor being scarred and dinted. Ackronnion is the epitome of a successful romantic hero. Ackronnion’s initial failure to move Sylvia to tears once again diminishes heroic deeds; but unlike the other suitors who went away “disconsolate,” Ackronnion “pondered as he went away” (Dunsany). He decides to take on the “bloody quest” of which he was denied and searches for the Gladsome Beast to force Sylvia to weep and to redeem the order of Western romance literature (Dunsany).[2] |
1. How can this topic sentence be improved? What logical operator is unnecessary?
2. How does the knight embody the idea that “might makes right”? |
Ackronnion’s decision, though, to kill the Gladsome Beast estranges Western heroes because the act blurs the roles of the villain and hero. The text never states that Ackronnion must slay the Beast to make Sylvia to weep–only that he must drink its tears. The text describes the Gladsome Beast: It is known how the lark in its zenith, children at play out-of-doors, good witches and jolly old parents have all been compared—how aptly!—with this very same Gladsome Beast. Only one "crab" he has (if I may use slang for a moment to make myself perfectly clear), only one drawback, and that is that in the gladness of his heart he spoils the cabbages of the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland,—and of course he eats men. (Dunsany) The Gladsome Beast is hardly described as a villain even though he is made out to be a villain by Ackronnion and the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland. The Beast is compared to others who are good and is even called a “synonym” for joy by the narrator (Dunsany). In fact, the narrator almost forgets the only serious drawback of the Beast, tagging on after discussing the Beast’s gladness: “and of course he eats men” (Dunsany)[1]. The Gladsome Beast is so joyful that he is questionably a villain, yet Ackronnion and the Old Man Who Looks After Fairyland paint him as one. In comparison, Ackronnion seems to unnecessarily slay the Beast; and since the Gladsome Beast is synonymous with joy, Ackronnion figuratively slays the joy of Fairyland, a feat that villains often try to accomplish in fantasies. Ackronnion’s heroism consequently becomes questionable, and Dunsany ensures that no character can strictly claim the role of the hero or the villain. As a result, Dunsany creates estrangement by making the Western hero unrecognizable from what his audience would be accustomed to for a romance.
|
1. What sort of beast “eats men” but is also a source of joy? Can you draw it? Is the gendered language of the quote intentional? |
Ackronnion’s failure to make Sylvia cry after he drinks the Beast’s tears exemplifies the anti-Tolkien tradition since no eucatastrophe is involved.[1] The problem in the story is that Sylvia cannot cry and therefore cannot love. By the end of the tale, Sylvia still does not weep and joy has been figuratively slain, so no consolation or “happy ending” is offered to the reader. Alyssa House-Thomas explains that Lord Dunsany was interested in literary Orientalism[2], stating, “Like a nineteenth century Romantic, Dunsany was interested as a writer more in the ideas which were commonly attached to the Orient, such as ‘splendor, cruelty, [and] sensuality’” (89). Rather than depicting the typical European “happy ending” to a romance, Dunsany attempts to move beyond Western ideas and adopts a “cruel” ending that is more in line with anti-Tolkien tradition (House-Thomas 89). By ending his tale in a way that is joyless and does not resolve the initial problems of the tale, Dunsany finishes his critique of the European romance, leaving readers in the tragedy of an unresolved problem and showing the futility of trying to change destiny. |
1. How can research here deepen the reader’s understanding of “eucasatrophe”?
2. What is “Orientalism”? Like the context of feminism above, how would a context of anti-orientalism change how the reader thinks about Dunsany? |
In conclusion, Lord Dunsany’s “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears” follows Tolkien tradition by modeling a European romance but strays from this tradition by estranging Western heroes and not offering a eucatastrophe. Dunsany sets up his story as a European romance but critiques the genre by having a courtly lady who cannot love and demands no perilous quest. Ackronnion tries to have a dangerous quest for her hand but blurs the roles of the villain and hero, which continues Dunsany’s critique of European romances. Finally, the story’s ending is relatively tragic since Sylvia does not weep.[1] By analyzing Dunsany’s fairy world, he proves to not only be an important influence for the Tolkien tradition but arguably a father for the anti-Tolkien tradition as well. |
1. And joy is dead! |
Works Cited[1] Dunsany, Lord. “The Quest of Queen's Tears.” The Book of Wonder, https://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/dun/tbow/tbow10.htm.
House-Thomas, Alyssa. “The Wondrous Orientalism of Lord Dunsany: Traditional and Non-Traditional Orientalist Narratives in the Book of Wonder and Tales of Wonder.” Mythlore, vol. 31, 2012, pp. 85–103.
Tolkien, J.R.R. “On Fairy Stories.” Brainstorm Services, West Chester University, 2004, brainstorm-services.com/wcu-2004/fairystories-tolkien.pdf.
|
1. Are all three sources cited in this essay? |
Attribution:
Cooper, R. Paul. “Sample Analysis of ‘The Quest of the Queen’s Tears.’” In Marvels and Wonders: Reading, Researching, and Writing about SF/F. 1st Edition. Edited by R. Paul Cooper, Claire Carly-Miles, Kalani Pattison, Jeremy Brett, Melissa McCoul, and James Francis, Jr. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2022. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
York, Kristen. “Reign of Anti-Tolkien Tradition in Dunsany’s “The Quest of the Queen’s Tears.” In Marvels and Wonders: Reading, Researching, and Writing about SF/F. 1st Edition. Edited by R. Paul Cooper, Claire Carly-Miles, Kalani Pattison, Jeremy Brett, Melissa McCoul, and James Francis, Jr. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2022. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.