2.3 Real Zeros of Polynomials
We now turn our attention to polynomial long division. Dividing two polynomials follows the same algorithm, in principle, as dividing two natural numbers so we review that process first. Suppose we wished to divide by . The standard division tableau is given below.
In this case, is called the divisor, 2585 is called the dividend, 32 is called the quotient and is called the remainder. We can check our answer by showing:
dividend = (divisor)(quotient) + remainder
or in this case, . We hope that the long division tableau evokes warm, fuzzy memories of your formative years as opposed to feelings of hopelessness and frustration. If you experience the latter, keep in mind that the Division Algorithm essentially is a two-step process, iterated over and over again. First, we guess the number of times the divisor goes into the dividend and then we subtract off our guess. We repeat those steps with what’s left over until what’s left over (the remainder) is less than what we started with (the divisor). That’s all there is to it!
The division algorithm for polynomials has the same basic two steps but when we subtract polynomials, we must take care to subtract like terms only. As a transition to polynomial division, let’s write out our previous division tableau in expanded form.
Written this way, we see that when we line up the digits we are really lining up the coefficients of the corresponding powers of – much like how we’ll have to keep the powers of lined up in the same columns. The big difference between polynomial division and the division of natural numbers is that the value of is an unknown quantity. So unlike using the known value of , when we subtract there can be no regrouping of coefficients as in our previous example. (The subtraction requires us to `regroup’ or `borrow’ from the tens digit, then the hundreds digit.) This actually makes polynomial division easier.[1] Before we dive into examples, we first state a theorem telling us when we can divide two polynomials, and what to expect when we do so.
Theorem 2.8 Polynomial Division
Suppose and are nonzero polynomial functions where the degree of is greater than or equal to the degree of . There exist two unique polynomial functions, and , such that
where either or the degree of is strictly less than the degree of .
Essentially, Theorem 2.8 tells us that we can divide polynomials whenever the degree of the divisor is less than or equal to the degree of the dividend. We know we’re done with the division when the polynomial left over (the remainder) has a degree strictly less than the divisor. It’s time to walk through a few examples.
Example 2.3.1
Example 2.3.1.1
Perform the indicated division.
Check your answer by showing
Solution:
Simplify .
o begin , we divide the first term in the dividend, namely , by the first term in the divisor, namely , and get . This then becomes the first term in the quotient. We proceed as in regular long division at this point: we multiply the entire divisor, , by this first term in the quotient to get . We then subtract this result from the dividend.
Now we `bring down’ the next term of the quotient, namely , and repeat the process. We divide , and add this to the quotient polynomial, multiply it by the divisor (which yields ) and subtract.
Finally, we `bring down’ the last term of the dividend, namely , and repeat the process. We divide , add this to the quotient, multiply it by the divisor (which yields ) and subtract.
In this case, we get a quotient of with a remainder of .
To check our answer, we compute
Example 2.3.1.2
Perform the indicated division.
Check your answer by showing
Solution:
Simplify .
To compute , we start as before. We find , so that becomes the first (and only) term in the quotient. We multiply the divisor by and get . We subtract this from the divided and get .
Our answer is with a remainder of .
To check our answer, we compute
Example 2.3.1.3
Perform the indicated division.
Check your answer by showing
Solution:
Simplify .
When we set-up the tableau for , we must first issue a `placeholder’ for the `missing’ -term in the dividend, . We then proceed as before. , thus is the first term in our quotient. We multiply times and subtract it from the dividend. We bring down the , and repeat.
Our answer is with a remainder of .
To check our answer, we compute:
Example 2.3.1.4
Perform the indicated division.
Check your answer by showing
Solution:
Simplify .
For our last example, we need `placeholders’ for both the divisor and the dividend . The first term in the quotient is , and when we multiply and subtract this from the dividend, we’re left with just .
The degree of (which is ) is less than the degree of the divisor (which is ), therefore we are done.[2]
Our answer is with a remainder of .
To check, we compute:
As you may recall, all of the polynomials in Theorem 2.8 have special names. The polynomial is called the dividend; is the divisor; is the quotient; is the remainder. If then is called a factor of . The word `unique’ here is critical in that it guarantees there is only one quotient and remainder for each division problem.[3] The proof of Theorem 2.8 is usually relegated to a course in Abstract Algebra, but we can still use the result to establish two important facts which are the basis of the rest of the section.
Theorem 2.9 The Remainder Theorem
Suppose is a polynomial function of degree at least and is a real number. When is divided by the remainder is . Said differently, there is a polynomial function such that:
The proof of Theorem 2.9 is a direct consequence of Theorem 2.8. Due to the fact that has degree , when a polynomial function is divided by , the remainder is either or degree (i.e., a nonzero constant.) In either case, , where , the remainder, is a real number, possibly . It follows that , so we get as required. There is one last `low hanging fruit’ to collect which we present below.
Theorem 2.10 The Factor Theorem
Suppose is a nonzero polynomial function. The real number is a zero of if and only if is a factor of .
Once again, we see the phrase `if and only if’ which means there are really two things being said in The Factor Theorem: if is a factor of , then is a zero of and the only way is a zero of is if is a factor of . We argue the Factor Theorem as follows: if is a factor of , then for some polynomial . Hence, , so is a zero of . Conversely, suppose is a zero of , so . The Remainder Theorem tells us . Hence, is a factor of .
We have enough theory to explain why the concept of multiplicity (Definition 2.9) is well-defined. If is a zero of , then The Factor Theorem tells us there is a polynomial function so that . If , then we apply the Factor Theorem to and find a polynomial so that . Hence, we have
We now `rinse and repeat’ this process. The degree of is a finite number, so this process has to end at some point. That is we arrive at a factorization where . Suppose we arrive at a different factorization of using other methods. That is, we find , where is a polynomial function with . Then we have . If , then either or . Assuming the former, then we may divide both sides by to get: . Because , and we would have , a contradiction as we are assuming . The assumption that likewise ends in a contradiction. Therefore, we have , so . By the uniqueness guaranteed in Theorem 2.8, we must have that . Hence, we have shown the number , as well as the quotient polynomial are unique. The process outlined above, in which we coax out factors of one at a time until we have all of them serves as a template for our work to come.
Of the things The Factor Theorem tells us, the most pragmatic is that we had better find a more efficient way to divide polynomial functions by quantities of the form . Fortunately, people like Ruffini and Horner have already blazed this trail. Let’s take a closer look at the long division we performed at the beginning of the section and try to streamline it. First off, let’s change all of the subtractions into additions by distributing through the s.
Next, observe that the terms , and are the exact opposite of the terms above them. The algorithm we use ensures this is always the case, so we can omit them without losing any information. Also note that the terms we `bring down’ (namely the and ) aren’t really necessary to recopy, so we omit them, too.
Let’s move terms up a bit and copy the into the last row.
Note that by arranging things in this manner, each term in the last row is obtained by adding the two terms above it. Notice also that the quotient polynomial can be obtained by dividing each of the first three terms in the last row by and adding the results.
2.3.1 Section Exercises
In Exercises 1 – 12, perform the indicated division. Check your answer by showing
In Exercises 13 – 26, use long division to perform the following polynomial divisions. Identify the quotient and remainder. Write the dividend, quotient and remainder in the form given in Theorem 2.8.
In Exercises 27 – 36, you are given a polynomial function and one of its zeros. Use long division to compute the quotient, then factor the quotient to determine the remaining real zeros, if possible.
- , is a zero of multiplicity 2
- , is a zero of multiplicity 3
- , is a zero of multiplicity 3
Section 2.3 Exercise Answers can be found in the Appendix … Coming soon