4.2 Properties of Power Functions and Their Graphs
Definition 4.2
Let and be nonzero real numbers. A power function is either a constant function or a function of the form .
Definition 4.2 broadens our scope of functions to include non-integer exponents such as , and . Our primary aim in this section is to ascribe meaning to these quantities.
4.2.1 Rational Number Exponents
The road to real number exponents starts by defining rational number exponents.
Definition 4.3
Let be a rational number where in lowest terms where is an integer and is a natural number.[1] If , then . If , then
whenever is defined.[2]
Moreover, per this definition, , so we may rewrite principal roots as exponents: and . This makes sense from an algebraic standpoint because per Theorem 4.2, . Hence if we were to assign an exponent notation to , say , then . If the properties of exponents are to hold, then, necessarily, , so or . While this argument helps motivate the notation, as we shall see shortly, great care must be exercised in applying exponent properties in these cases. The long and short of this is that root functions as defined in Section 4.1 are all members of the `power functions’ family.
Another important item worthy of note in Definition 4.3 is that it is absolutely essential we express the rational number in lowest terms before applying the root-power definition. For example, consider . Expressing in lowest terms, we get: . Hence, or , either of which is defined for all real numbers . In contrast, consider the equivalence . Here, the expression is defined only for owing to the presence of the even indexed root, . Hence, unless . On the other hand, the expression is defined for all numbers, , as for all . In fact, it can be shown that for all real numbers. This means . So, to review, in general we have: , but unless . Once again the easiest way to avoid confusion here is to reduce the exponent to lowest terms before converting it to root-power notation.
Likewise, we have to be careful about the properties of exponents when it comes to rational exponents. Consider, for instance, the product rule for integer exponents: . Consider and . In the first case, only for . In the second case, for all real numbers . Even though for , and are different functions as they have different domains.
Similarly, the power rule for integer exponents: does not hold in general for rational exponents. To see this, consider the three functions: , , and . In the first case, for only (this is the same function above.) In the second case, the rational number , so for all real numbers, (this is the same function from above.) In the last case, for all real numbers, . Once again, despite for all , and and are three different functions. We graph , , and below.
In general, the properties of integer exponents do not extend to rational exponents unless the bases involved represent non-negative real numbers or the roots involved are odd. We have the following:
Theorem 4.3
Let and are rational numbers. The following properties hold provided none of the computations results in division by and either and have odd denominators or and :
- Product Rules: and .
- Quotient Rules: and
- Power Rule:
Next, we turn our attention to the graphs of for varying values of and . When is even, the domain is restricted owing to the presence of the even indexed root to . The range is likewise , a fact left to the reader. All of the functions below are increasing on their domains, and it turns out this is always the case provided . There is, however, a difference in how the functions are increasing – and this is the concept of concavity. As with many concepts we’ve encountered so far in the text, concavity is most precisely defined using Calculus terminology, but we can nevertheless get a sense of concavity geometrically. For us, a curve is concave up over an interval if it resembles a portion of a `‘ shape. Similarly, a curve is called concave down over an interval if resembles part of a `‘ shape. When , the graphs of resemble the left half of and so are concave down; when , the graphs resemble the right half of a `‘ and are hence described as `concave up.’
Below we graph several examples of where is odd. Here, the domain is because the index on the root here is odd. Note that when is even, the graphs appear to be symmetric about the -axis and the range looks to be . When is odd, the graphs appear to be symmetric about the origin with range . We leave verification of these facts to the reader. Note here also that for , the graphs are down for and concave up for .
When , we have variables appear in the denominator which open the opportunities for vertical and horizontal asymptotes. Below are graphed two examples
Unsurprisingly, Theorem 4.1, which, as stated, applied to root functions, generalizes to all rational powers.
Theorem 4.4
For real numbers , , , and and rational number with , the graph of can be obtained from the graph of by performing the following operations, in sequence:
- add to each of the -coordinates of the points on the graph of . This results in a horizontal shift to the right if or left if .
NOTE: This transforms the graph of to . - divide the -coordinates of the points on the graph obtained in Step 1 by . This results in a horizontal scaling, but may also include a reflection about the -axis if .
NOTE: This transforms the graph of to . - multiply the -coordinates of the points on the graph obtained in Step 2 by . This results in a vertical scaling, but may also include a reflection about the -axis if .
NOTE: This transforms the graph of to . - add to each of the -coordinates of the points on the graph obtained in Step 3. This results in a vertical shift up if or down if .
NOTE: This transforms the graph of to .
The proof of Theorem 4.4 is identical to that of Theorem 4.1, and we suggest the reader work through the details. We give Theorem 4.4 a test run in the following example.
Example 4.2.1
Example 4.2.1.1
Use the given graphs of below long with Theorem 4.4 to graph . State the domain and range of using interval notation.
Graph .
Solution:
Graph using the graph of provided.
The expression is given to us in the form prescribed by Theorem 4.4, and we identify , , , , and .
Even though the graph of is given to us, it’s worth taking a moment to reinforce some concepts. We proceed as we have several times in the past, beginning with the horizontal shift.
Step 2: divide each of the -coordinates of each of the points on the graph of by :
In lowest terms, , thus it makes sense the domain and range of are both all real numbers and the graph is symmetric about the origin.[4] Moreover, because , the concavity matches what we would expect, too.
We get the domain and range here are both .
Example 4.2.1.2
Use the given graph of below long with Theorem 4.4 to graph . State the domain and range of using interval notation.
Graph .
Solution:
Graph using the graph of provided.
We first need to rewrite in the form required by Theorem 4.4: . We identify , , , , and
Step 1: add to each of the -coordinates of each of the points on the graph of :
Step 2: , so we proceed directly to Step 3.
Step 3: multiply each of the -coordinates of each of the points on the graph of by :
Step 4: add to each of the -coordinates of each of the points on the graph of :
As is in lowest terms and has an even denominator,8, it makes sense the domain and range of is . Also, because , the graph of is concave down, as we would expect.
From the graph, we get the domain is and the range is
We now turn our attention to more complicated functions involving rational exponents.
Example 4.2.2
Example 4.2.2.1
For the following function:
- Analytically:
- State the domain
- Identify the axis intercepts
- Analyze the end behavior
- Construct a sign diagram for each function using the intercepts and sketch a graph
- Use technology to determine:
- The range
- The local extrema, if they exist
- Intervals where the function is increasing
- Intervals where the function is decreasing
Solution:
Analyze and graph .
We first note that, owing to the negative exponent, the quantity is in the denominator, alerting us to a potential domain issue. Rewriting we set about solving . Cubing both sides and extracting square roots gives or . Hence, is excluded from the domain.[5] The root involved here is odd (), so the only issue we have is with the denominator, hence our domain is or .
While not required to do so, we analyze the behavior of near . As , and . Hence,
As such,
We conclude as , . As , and , and we likewise get
This analysis suggests is a vertical asymptote to the graph.
To find the -intercepts, we set , so that or .
We get is our only – (and -)intercept.
For end behavior, we note that in the denominator the term dominates the constant term, so as ,
This suggests is a horizontal asymptote to the graph.
For the sign diagram, we note that has only one zero, and is undefined at . For all values between these two numbers, or .
Our sign diagram for is below.
Graphing below bears out our analysis regarding zeros and asymptotes.
The range appears to be , with the graph of crossing its horizontal asymptote between and
We see we have a single local minimum at with is decreasing on and and increasing on
Example 4.2.2.2
For the following function:
- Analytically:
- State the domain
- Identify the axis intercepts
- Analyze the end behavior
- Construct a sign diagram for each function using the intercepts and sketch a graph
- Use technology to determine:
- The range
- The local extrema, if they exist
- Intervals where the function is increasing
- Intervals where the function is decreasing
Solution:
Analyze and graph .
To find the domain of , we have two issues to address: the denominator and an even (square) root. Solving gives two excluded values, .
For the numerator, we may rewrite , so we require , or . Extracting square roots, we have or which means or .
Taking into account our excluded values , we get the domain of is
Looking near , we note that as , , a positive number. As ,
, so
This suggests as , .
On the other hand, as ,
, so
, suggesting . Similarly, we find as , and as ,
This suggests we have two vertical asymptotes to the graph of : and
To find the -intercepts, we set and solve . This reduces to or . As these are (just barely!) in the domain of , we have two -intercepts, and .
The graph of has no -intercepts, because is not in the domain of , so is undefined.
Regarding end behavior, as , the in both numerator and denominator dominate the constant terms, so we have
This suggests that as , the graph of resembles . Using the piecewise definition of , we have that as , and as , . In other words, the graph of has two slant asymptotes with slopes
For the sign diagram for , we note that has zeros and is undefined at . Moreover, there is a gap in the domain for all values in the interval , so we excise that portion of the real number line for our discussion.
We find or on the intervals and while or on and
Our sign diagram for is below and graphing below verifies our analysis.
From the graph, the range appears to be .
The points and are local minimums. appears to be decreasing on , , and . Likewise, is increasing on , and .
The graph of certainly appears to be symmetric about the -axis.
We leave it to the reader to show is, indeed, an even function.
4.2.2 Real Number Exponents
We wish now to extend the concept of `exponent’ from rational to all real numbers which means we need to discuss how to interpret an irrational exponent. Once again, the notions presented here are best discussed using the language of Calculus or Analysis, but we nevertheless do what we can with the notions we have.
Consider the wildly famous irrational number . The number is defined geometrically as the ratio of the circumference of a circle to that circle’s diameter.[6] The reason we use the symbol `‘ instead of any numerical expression is that is an irrational number, and, as such, its decimal representation neither terminates nor repeats. Hence we approximate as or . No matter how many digits we write, however, what we have is a rational number approximation of .
The good news is we can approximate to any desired accuracy using rational numbers by taking enough digits, so while we’ll never `reach’ the exact value of with rational numbers, we can get as close as we like to using rational numbers. That being said, we assume exists on the real number line, despite the fact the list of digits to pinpoint its location is, in some sense, infinite.
We take this approach when defining the value of a number raised to an irrational exponent. Consider, for instance, . We can compute
and so on, so one way to define as the unique real number we obtain as the exponents `approach’ .
It is with this understanding that we present the notion of a `power function,’ as described in Definition 4.2: where and are nonzero real number parameters. Here the exponent is open to any (nonzero) real number. Because of how we define real number exponents, if is irrational, then to avoid having negatives under even-indexed roots as we go through the approximation process.[7]
In general, real number exponents inherit their properties from rational number exponents. For instance, Theorem 4.3 also holds for all real number exponents and the graphs of power functions inherit their behavior from graphs of rational exponent functions. More specifically, the graphs of functions of the form where all contain the points and . Moreover, these functions are increasing and their graphs are concave down if and concave up if .
Theorem 4.4 generalizes to real number power functions, so, for instance to graph , one need only start with and shift horizontally two units to the right. (See the Exercises.)
4.2.3 Section Exercises
In Exercises 1 – 6, use the given graphs along with Theorem 4.4 to graph the given function. Track at least two points and state the domain and range using interval notation.
In Exercises 7 – 8, find a formula for each function below in the form . NOTE: There may be more than one solution!
For each function in Exercises 9 – 16 below
- Analytically:
- state the domain
- identify the axis intercepts
- analyze the end behavior
- Construct a sign diagram for each function using the intercepts and sketch a graph
- Use technology to determine
- the range
- the local extrema, if they exist
- intervals where the function is increasing/decreasing
- any `unusual steepness’ or `local’ verticality
- vertical asymptotes
- horizontal / slant asymptotes
- Comment on any observed symmetry
- For each function listed below, compute the average rate of change over the indicated interval.[8] What trends do you observe? How do your answers manifest themselves graphically? Compare the results of this exercise with those of Exercise 51 in Section 2.2 and Exercise 43 in Section 3.2.
- The National Weather Service uses the following formula to calculate the wind chill:
where is the wind chill temperature in F, is the air temperature in F, and is the wind speed in miles per hour. Note that is defined only for air temperatures at or lower than F and wind speeds above miles per hour.
- Suppose the air temperature is and the wind speed is miles per hour. Compute the wind chill temperature. Round your answer to two decimal places.
- Suppose the air temperature is F and the wind chill temperature is F. Compute the wind speed. Round your answer to two decimal places.
Section 4.2 Exercise Answers can be found in the Appendix … Coming soon
- Recall `lowest terms' means and have no common factors other than . ↵
- That is, if is even, and if , . ↵
- Either is a special case in Definition 4.3 or we need to define what is meant by . The authors chose the former. ↵
- The domain is all real numbers as the denominator (root) is odd; the range is all real numbers because the numerator (power) is odd. Because both power and root are odd, the function itself is an odd function, hence the symmetry about the origin. ↵
- In general if where , then . ↵
- This works for each and every circle, by the way, regardless of how large or small the circle is! ↵
- or if is negative. ↵
- See Definition 1.11 in Section 1.3.4 for a review of this concept, as needed. ↵
A power function is a function of the form constant times x to a real number power.